Understanding how event sourcing is different from normal CRUD design?
When building modern applications, choosing the right architecture for data storage and management is critical. Event Sourcing is one such approach gaining popularity for its ability to provide a robust, flexible, and auditable system. But what exactly is Event Sourcing, and how does it differ from the traditional CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) design? Let’s dive in.
What is Event Sourcing?
Event Sourcing is a design pattern that revolves around storing the state of an application as a series of events. Instead of saving the current state of data in a database, Event Sourcing records every change (or event) made to the state. The state of the system at any point in time is derived by replaying these events in sequence.
Key Concepts of Event Sourcing:
- Events as a Single Source of Truth: Events are immutable records of actions or changes that have occurred in the system (e.g., “OrderPlaced,” “PaymentProcessed”).
- Rebuild State: The current state of an application is derived by replaying the event log.
- Auditability: Every change is captured, enabling full traceability of all actions.
- Event Store: A specialized database or storage system used to persist the event log.
Example:
Imagine a banking application. Instead of storing just the account balance, an event-sourced system would store events like:
- DepositMade(+$100)
- WithdrawalMade(-$50)
To calculate the current balance, the application replays these events: $100 – $50 = $50.
What is CRUD Design?
CRUD stands for Create, Read, Update, Delete and represents a traditional way of managing data. In a CRUD-based design, the current state of the data is stored directly in the database. When updates are made, the previous state is overwritten, and only the latest state is available.
Key Characteristics of CRUD Design:
- State Overwrites: Only the current state of data is stored, and historical changes are often lost unless explicitly logged.
- Simplicity: CRUD is straightforward to implement and works well for many applications.
- Focus on Entities: CRUD operations are typically centered around entities (e.g., rows in a database table).
Example:
In the same banking application, a CRUD system might store an account table with the current balance as a column:
AccountID: 12345 | Balance: $50
If a deposit is made, the balance is updated directly, overwriting the previous state.
Key Differences Between Event Sourcing and CRUD Design
| Feature | Event Sourcing | CRUD Design |
| State Management | State is derived by replaying events. | State is stored directly in the database. |
| Auditability | Full history of changes is inherently available. | Historical changes are lost unless explicitly logged. |
| Immutability | Events are immutable and append-only. | Data can be overwritten and deleted. |
| Complexity | Requires additional effort to manage event replay and projections. | Simple to implement and understand. |
| Use Cases | Best for systems requiring traceability, auditing, or complex workflows. | Suitable for straightforward applications with minimal history needs. |
Advantages of Event Sourcing
- Audit Trails: Perfect for systems where transparency and traceability are critical, such as financial systems or compliance-heavy industries.
- Replayability: Ability to replay events allows debugging and the recreation of past states for analysis.
- Scalability: Event logs can be partitioned and processed independently, making it easier to handle high-scale systems.
- Flexibility: New views or projections can be created from the same event log without altering the original data.
Challenges of Event Sourcing
- Complexity: Requires more effort to implement compared to CRUD, including designing the event schema and managing eventual consistency.
- Event Storage Growth: As events accumulate over time, managing the size of the event store can become challenging.
- Learning Curve: Developers need to understand concepts like eventual consistency and projections.
When to Use Event Sourcing?
Event Sourcing is ideal for:
- Systems where auditability and traceability are critical.
- Applications that require a historical record of all changes (e.g., finance, healthcare).
- Distributed systems where capturing every state change is crucial.
- Event-driven architectures that naturally fit with event sourcing.
When CRUD Design is Sufficient
CRUD remains the better choice for:
- Simple applications where state changes are minimal and rarely need to be audited.
- Systems with straightforward data models and workflows.
- Applications where performance needs prioritize simplicity over traceability.
Conclusion
Event Sourcing and CRUD design each serve distinct purposes, and their suitability depends on the application’s requirements. While CRUD is perfect for simplicity and quick development, Event Sourcing shines in complex systems requiring a detailed history, replayability, and scalability.
When choosing between the two, consider the trade-offs in complexity, scalability, and functionality. For systems that demand robust audit trails and flexibility in data reconstruction, Event Sourcing is a game-changer. On the other hand, CRUD remains the go-to solution for straightforward, no-frills applications.
Pizenith is a trusted technology partner specializing in Data Engineering, Machine Learning, AI, Cloud Engineering, DevOps, and Functional Programming with Scala and Java. We help businesses scale with secure, automated, and data-driven solutions, delivering innovation in Test Automation and DevSecOps. Trusted by global enterprises, we empower organizations to stay ahead with AI-powered insights and scalable cloud infrastructure.
Want to future-proof your tech stack? Let’s talk! or reach us at info@pizenith.com.
